This is why there is an urgent need for the philosophy of history to work in every field in order to take a proactive position and to discover the laws that regulate events and to act on values instead of facts. It is up to this point whether to stay in the mind-besiegedness or to break the patterns, which are not ours from the evil eye. We are tired of looking at the West all the time. We forgot the color of our eyes because we were looking through the lenses of a particular culture.
The new world order is pushing humanity towards inhuman forms of global governance. States are tried to be deprived of the will and ability to maintain their independence, let alone forming the elements of a just and peaceful world order. In this respect, Turkey should act with the awareness that it does not have the luxury of pursuing a "precious loneliness" strategy in the new period in the region, and should raise its level to a strategic concept that will give hope to the entire geography.
The basin of Turkey in the region being the last bastion of the Islamic civilization that derives from the historical depth and experience, both geocultural, geostrategic and geopolitical codes in the process of the formation of robust and especially the new build and de facto not clearly saw this game in perspective in this dirty war, declared to the whole world in an unreserved way. It is possible to say that this decision strengthens our hand and minimizes the risk in terms of not entering into an uncertain conflict environment.
In this new chapter that capitalism has reached, large capital groups and monopolies, which are called finance capital, formed from the combination of financial capital and industrial capital, emerged. Unlike the old-style colonialism, imperialism, which emerged especially from the 1870s, is the result of this capitalist economic development.
"...Although parties, governments and organizations involved in the process develop discourses and policies that result from cyclical pressures on their bases and shift to populism, NGOs and media need to create synergies for the continuity of the process with different presentations that will strengthen the process, away from these populist approaches. In this way, the parties taking the initiative are presented with different locations and reminded that the road map determined is not final and that permanent peace is the final one..."
Christian Europe, inspired by Giles Kepel, sees the new Muslim institutions in Europe (from halal food to business, financial and educational institutions) as instruments for the global spread of Islam and develops some counter-rhetoric with this phobia. The clearest example of this is the PEGIDA (Patriotische Europäer gegen die Islamisierung des Abendlandes), the “Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamicisation of the Occident” movement, of which feasibility and exploration seem to date back a long time. As its name suggests, the movement is of anti-Islamic origin rather than a racist originated.
Just as Erdoğan’s discourse of “one minute” in Davos was more effective than the former Iranian President Ahmadinejad’s slogan “We will wipe Israel off the map”; It should not be forgotten that the phrase “The world is bigger than five” is more effective, realistic and applicable than the slogan “Let the UN be discharged, NATO should be ruled out”.
It is a fact that even criminals imprisoned for ordinary crimes in Ukraine and Syria are prepared and put on the field by the administrations. We know a similar practice from the use of prisoners in prisons against Saddam in the US invasion of Iraq. To put it without hesitation, the "Gezi Events" were also an attempt by global imperialism to ignite low-intensity hybrid warfare. So, they could neutralize power and bring it to its knees or take it down completely. Today, the strategy of “carrying the war into the enemy's land” is not only a tactic applied by terrorist organizations, but has been adopted as a policy by hegemonic states, just like in examples such as Afghanistan and Iraq.
...As in the recent past, we cannot ignore the efforts of the USA to design the cultural, ethnic and sectarian regional balances in the future. Although the "gun boat" diplomacy, which was applied in the past and damaged its own dynamics in the process, was abandoned, it is a known fact that the USA always aims to be at the top of the global geopolitical power pyramid with new paradigms...
“...The fact that Syria and Europe had to face the problem of war came up as a separate phenomenon. Because the crisis is at the gates of Europe. Perhaps it is necessary to pile more refugees at the gates of Europe. At least one million if possible, provided that there is more...”
“... the global consumption culture continues on its way without slowing down by eroding and de-identifying ancient local values. While shopping malls were transformed into Postmodern Temples of Consumption, people fascinated by the creative performances of these fantasy palaces turned from those who went to the shopping just because they needed it into bargained effectively, spending hours and "freely" between commodities without purchasing, people became acquiescent of fixed prices. Consumption, which was based on the concept of “need” in the traditional period, started to be based on the concepts of “desire” and “request” in the late modern or postmodern period ..."
If we go back to the periods when new mass media, multimedia and television were not yet available, the printing and distribution of newspapers were insufficient, and the literacy rates were low, the most effective mass communication tool at that time was undoubtedly the radio. For this reason, radio has got its name in the history of audio communication, politics and propaganda as "radio wars", "golden years of radio" or "interference wars".
The following example given by the American political scientist Richard Fagen explains the effect of mass media on society and politics in a striking way: “If there was an opportunity to establish a network of deceit that could place 2 thousand people at key points in mass media, it would be possible to convince the whole of America and a large part of the world that the President of the USA is dead!”
“...The audience, who distanced itself from the reality of the world on television, gradually begins to perceive the fantasy emanating from the television as a reality. Moreover, these fantasies emanating from television gain their reality in storytelling, and television provides this with its most realistically dramatized narrative. This situation worsens for those who watch television a lot, and by this means, the audience is increasingly imprisoned in the conditions they are in...”